AI Agent Authorisation Review
Make delegated authority inspectable. Trace who an agent acts for, what it can access and how that access can be withdrawn.
AI Security and Privacy
Examine agent authority, adversarial behaviour, isolation boundaries and personal-data flows in an agreed threat and processing context.
Book a 30 minute readiness callKnow what an agent can reach, and what it can reveal.
Examine agent authority, adversarial behaviour, isolation boundaries and personal-data flows in an agreed threat and processing context. Begin with an agreed workflow, accountable owner and representative evidence. The engagement defines its coverage, dependencies and decision criteria before work starts.
Make delegated authority inspectable. Trace who an agent acts for, what it can access and how that access can be withdrawn.
Make every delegation explicit. Examine who the agent acts for, where it can execute and which tools it can reach when instructions alone are not enough.
Challenge the boundaries that matter to your workflow. Test agreed attack scenarios against agent instructions, tools and data access.
Examine the boundary between agent execution and the systems around it, including files, networks, secrets and cleanup.
Design authority and isolation into the system. Review trust boundaries, credentials, tools and recovery before deployment choices become difficult to change.
Look beyond a successful demonstration. Examine the permissions, dependencies and operational controls that shape an agent’s behaviour in deployment.
Trace personal data through your agent workflow. Examine collection, memory, retrieval, tool access and retention against your agreed requirements.
Examine how adversarial inputs, tools and dependencies can change agent behaviour.
Define who an agent acts for, which permissions it receives and how authority ends.
Examine execution isolation, network access, secrets and recovery boundaries.
Connect inventory, accountability, oversight and evidence to AI operating decisions.
Examine data flows, retention, access boundaries and privacy requirements in context.
A little more clarity
Start with the questions that shape a better decision.
Examine agent authority, adversarial behaviour, isolation boundaries and personal-data flows in an agreed threat and processing context. Indicative focus areas include agent identity and authorisation, threat modelling, adversarial testing, sandbox boundaries, deployment controls, data flows and retention.
They answer one question from three sides: what an agent may act as, how it can be misused, and what it can expose. In a deployment those are the same boundary, and separating them tended to split a single review across three engagements. Each discipline keeps its own capability page, and an engagement is scoped to the question you actually have.
Yes. Privacy engineering sits here because the same boundary decides what personal data an agent can read, retain and send onward. The family covers privacy review work scoped for privacy and data protection owners, and the privacy discipline has its own capability page linked from this one. The work examines technical and operating controls; it does not determine lawful processing, approve transfers, certify compliance or provide legal advice.
Examine agent authority, adversarial behaviour, isolation boundaries and personal-data flows in an agreed threat and processing context. Begin with an agreed workflow, accountable owner and representative evidence. The engagement defines its coverage, dependencies and decision criteria before work starts.
Know what an agent can reach, and what it can reveal. Findings and indicative outputs apply to the agreed scope. Your accountable owner retains deployment, investment and risk decisions.
Bring the workflow, the constraints and the evidence you already have.